| July 14, 2009
HealthDay News
Cancer and Supplements: What Vitamins,
Herbs, and Botanicals Can (and Can't) Do
5 reasons there aren't a lot of answers—and 4 things you can do
until there are
By Katherine Hobson
Few things in medicine get simpler the more you investigate them,
and the use of vitamins, minerals, and herbal and botanical supplements
to prevent or treat cancer is no exception. Recent clinical trials,
for example, suggest that supplements of single nutrients like vitamins
B, C, and E and the mineral selenium do not, as once thought, prevent
chronic or age-related diseases including prostate and other kinds
of cancer. Some substances, like green tea and ginger, seem to have
potential in preventing or helping to treat cancer, but they may
also actually interfere with treatment or have other serious side
effects. Meantime, countless substances that kill or slow the growth
of cancer cells in a test tube have not shown that same success
in human beings.
What's going on? As it turns out, the question of whether—and in
what form—nutrients can be extracted from food or plants and used
to fight cancer is quite complex. Researchers in this young field
are probing the connections and contradictions but have not yet
found answers to the question of what vitamins, herbs, or botanicals
may help prevent, treat, or ameliorate symptoms of cancer. Here
are a few reasons—plus guidance on what to do in the face of incomplete
information.
It's hard to know what to study. You'd think it
would be easy to test whether, say, something as straightforward
as vitamin E has a role in cancer prevention. But the difficulties
begin at once: Which form do you use? Should a study use supplements
of alpha-tocopherol, the form most easily absorbed by humans? Or
a mixture of the vitamin's eight forms? It gets even more difficult
to identify the best component—or components—to study in herbals
and botanicals, which contain many different compounds.
And if you want to study supplements together for cancer prevention,
what might work best with what? "Unless we have a very clear
idea of the pathways and mechanisms that cancer is using, it's hard
to have a very strong, rational basis for choosing combinations"
of antioxidants or other nutrients, says Peter Gann, director of
pathology research at the University of Illinois in Chicago. The
problem exists in treatment, too. With so many chemotherapy regimens
and so many herbs or botanicals that might theoretically aid their
action, what combinations should be studied?
Clinical trials in humans often turn up results different
from what happens in the lab. Curcumin (derived from the
spice turmeric), quercetin (a kind of plant pigment), and a host
of other food-derived chemicals, vitamins, and herbal products have
been shown to kill or slow the growth of cancer cells in a lab.
Whether these positive results translate to human beings is an entirely
different question—as with drugs, many things that are promising
in a test tube or in animals fail miserably when studied in the
complexity of a human being.
In addition, those human studies are particularly tough to fund
and pull off. Supplement makers rarely have an incentive to support
research, since it's already legal for their products to be on the
shelves. That same availability also means that people assigned
to the no-supplement control group may opt to take the supplement
under study on their own, contaminating the results. Work is being
done, but drawing conclusions will take time. "It's very important
that people understand there's research going on but that not all
the answers are in," says David Rosenthal, medical director
of the Zakim Center for Integrative Therapies at Dana-Farber Cancer
Center in Boston.
Your supplements may vary. The pills and capsules
you pick up off the shelf of a health-food store can vary enormously
in quality and dose. About 25 percent of supplements tested fail
when evaluated by whether they contain the claimed amount of a key
ingredient, can be readily absorbed by the body, and are free of
harmful contaminants, says Tod Cooperman, president of ConsumerLab.com,
an independent lab that tests supplements. When his lab tested five
green tea products, for example, two failed. (One brand contained
as much caffeine as two cans of cola despite saying otherwise, and
it had half the active ingredients it claimed.)
Moreover, the botanical—and then how it acts in the body—can vary
depending on where it's grown, how much sunlight it receives, the
soil, and other factors, says Jeffrey White, director of the National
Cancer Institute's Office of Complementary and Alternative Medicine.
That can make botanicals tough to standardize, which is essential
in order to study and take advantage of their effects.
Effects are complicated and change depending on the circumstances.
A rose is a rose is a rose, but that doesn't hold for antioxidants.
Beta carotene in the diet, for example, is associated with a lower
risk of lung cancer. But when studied as a supplement, it actually
increased the incidence of the disease among smokers. The thought
is that under certain circumstances, its action changes, and it
has damaging effects. "A single nutrient can shift from Jekyll
to Hyde," says Keith Block, cofounder and medical director
of the Block Center for Integrative Cancer Care in Chicago.
No wonder the role of antioxidants during cancer treatment is controversial;
on one hand, they may protect the healthy cells from the harsh effects
and damage of chemotherapy and radiation. On the other, they may
protect the cancer cells as well, rendering treatment less effective.
Without large trials to provide answers, most oncologists recommend
that patients lay off the antioxidant supplements during treatment.
But Block says harmful effects were limited to smokers, and he believes
the available evidence supports the use of antioxidants in nonsmoking
patients undergoing chemotherapy and, probably, radiation as well.
By reducing the toxic side effects of treatment, he says, antioxidants
can help patients complete their full regimens, which has been linked
to lower mortality. (He says the risk-benefit ratio better supports
the use of antioxidants in patients with metastatic disease; he'd
be more likely to hold off until the question is settled among patients
for whom cancer treatment is likely to offer a cure.)
Specific supplements may interact with specific anticancer drugs;
scientists said earlier this year that in mice, an ingredient in
green tea extract blocked the effects of Velcade, used to treat
multiple myeloma. Green tea, however, has been associated with lower
rates of cancer while taken in tea form, and some research suggests
that its active ingredients, taken as a supplement, can slow the
progression of prostate cancer. Like other compounds, it's probably
helpful in some contexts and harmful in others.
There's not a silver bullet. It is not likely
that one isolated nutrient is going to have a large effect in preventing
cancer, say many researchers. "I personally think we will find
that individual supplements are not the answer," says Kara
Kelly, medical director of the Integrative Therapies Program for
Children With Cancer at Children's Hospital of NewYork-Presbyterian.
To her, that suggests focusing far more on diet (more on that later).
As far as supplements go, many experts say there's a movement toward
products that more closely mimic whole foods, delivering nutrients
together in a state more similar to, say, how you'd get them if
you ate a piece of fruit. But no supplement is likely to make a
big difference if accompanied by a poor diet, lack of exercise,
smoking, or other harmful factors. "If I live on burgers and
fries, loading my body not only with fats but with the wrong fats,
one fish oil capsule isn't going to do the trick," says Block.
So what's a person concerned about cancer prevention—or who is
fighting the disease—to do?
Research. Two good databases of information on
specific supplements are produced by the American Cancer Society
and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Both outline the evidence
for the role of herbals, botanicals, and vitamin/mineral supplements
in preventing and treating cancer, plus any possible risks and drug
interactions. ConsumerLab.com, which requires an annual subscription,
also has that information, in addition to guidance on specific brands.
Fully disclose to your doctor. Because there's the potential for
side effects and drug interactions with so many supplements, from
ginger to St.-John's-wort, it's imperative that people being treated
for cancer tell their physicians what they're taking. That doesn't
mean you will be greeted by a lecture; you may find your doctor
recommends or OKs certain supplements. Lorenzo Cohen, director of
the integrative medicine program at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
in Houston, says that while he tends to err on the side of caution,
he's not going to tell people to avoid anything for which there's
no evidence of harm.
Even if you aren't a cancer patient, you should tell your healthcare
provider about any supplements you're taking. And recognize that
more is not necessarily better when it comes to using vitamins and
minerals for disease prevention. "We don't know whether going
above the baseline helps," says Cohen.
Realize that what's good for someone else may not be good
for you. It's important to know that supplements can reduce
the effectiveness of certain treatments or make them more toxic—and
that what worked for your friend with breast cancer may not work
for you. Block does recommend supplements for his patients but tailors
them to their circumstances. Those may include the type of cancer—whether
a breast cancer is estrogen receptor positive or negative, for example—treatment
regimen, specific symptoms, and other conditions in the body. Other
doctors say they'll also recommend certain supplements, namely omega-3
fatty acids, calcium, and vitamin D, but their advice, too, will
ultimately be individualized.
Eat a balanced, healthful diet. While the role
of diet in cancer prevention or in preventing recurrence isn't clear,
there's no downside to following the eating patterns (including
the Mediterranean diet) associated with better health outcomes and
lower body weight. That means eating lots of fruits and vegetables,
fish, legumes, and whole grains and avoiding heavily processed,
nutritionally empty foods. "Many of the things we take in supplements
are found in food," says Donald Abrams, director of the integrative
oncology research program at the University of California-San Francisco.
And the naturally occurring levels of those nutrients are not likely
to be harmful.
|