| December
13, 2007
Medical News Today
Eating Less Red And Processed Meat
Likely Reduces Cancer Risk, Study
A new study by researchers in the US suggests that people who eat
the least red and processed meat are the least likely to develop
cancer compared to people who eat the most.
The research is published in the journal PLoS Medicine and is the
work of Amanda Cross and colleagues at the US National Cancer Institute.
Studies on the link between red and processed meat consumption
and specific types of cancer have already been done, but the authors
said they wanted to explore the link between red and processed meat
and a number of malignancy types.
The researchers used data from the National Institutes of Health
(NIH) AARP (used to be the American Association for Retired Persons)
Diet and Health Study. This has a total of half a million participants
aged from 50 to 71 when they were enrolled between 1995 and 1996.
When they enrolled the participants filled in a food frequency questionnaire
about their diet, including how much meat they consumed, how often,
and of what type.
The researchers used a statistical method called Cox proportional
hazards regression to find links between meat consumption patterns
and cancer outcomes.
The results were analysed in quintiles (fifths) of red and processed
meat intake, that is for each of the two categories of meat, each
participant was put into one of five groups, depending on their
intake. The participants who ate the most were in the top 20 per
cent or quintile, and the ones who ate the least were in the bottom
20 per cent or quintile.
The results showed that:
- During up to 8.2 years of follow up, there were 53,396 cancer
incidents in the overall cohort.
- For read meat intake, the 20 per cent of participants who ate
the most, showed statistically significant higher risks for esophageal,
colorectal, liver, and lung cancer, compared to the 20 per cent
who ate the least.
- The risks ranged from 20 to 60 per cent higher, depending on
the type of cancer.
- For processed meat consumption, the 20 per cent of participants
who ate the most, showed a 20 per cent higher risk for colorectal
cancer, and a 16 per cent higher risk of lung cancer, compared
to the 20 per cent who ate the least.
The authors concluded that:
"Both red and processed meat intakes were positively associated
with cancers of the colorectum and lung; furthermore, red meat intake
was associated with an elevated risk for cancers of the esophagus
and liver."
The researchers took into account potential confounding factors
such as smoking status, but admit other lifestyle factors may have
influenced the results.
Also, there was a degree of overlap in the definitions of red and
processed meat. For example, bacon and ham were included in both
definitions. So it is not possible to say for certain which of the
two types of meat is linked to which type of cancer.
Another limitation of the study was that most of the participants
were non-Hispanic whites, so the findings may not apply equally
to people with other genetic backgrounds.
However, the authors are confident that their findings strongly
suggest reducing consumption of red and processed meat reduces overall
cancer incidence.
In another article in the same issue of the journal, Anita Koushik
(Department of Social and Preventative Medicine, University of Montreal,
Canada) and Jeanine Genkinger (Department of Oncology, Division
of Cancer Genetics and Epidemiology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer
Center, Georgetown University, Washington), reviewed the study and
other key research on the links between meat intake and cancer.
They stressed that the strongest risk factors for cancer among
Americans are smoking and obesity, but conceded that understanding
the complexity of how diet, smoking and obesity interact, and how
specific foods and nutrients are processed through the body's metabolism,
could shed light on the development and perhaps even more importantly,
the prevention of cancer.
They concluded that red and processed meat consumption "appears
to be positively associated with risk of cancer of the colon and
rectum, esophagus, liver, lung, and pancreas in a new, large US
cohort study of 500,000 men and women". But the study yielded
little support for a link with other types of cancer.
They referred to current dietary guidelines that recommended consuming
meat that was lean, low or free of fat, thus promoting limited red
and processed meat consumption. The guidelines they referred to
were the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (2005), produced by the
US Department of Health and Human Services and the US Department
of Agriculture.
|