| April 3,
2007
National Cancer Institute
MRI Detects Nearly All Contralateral
Breast Cancers
By Carmen Phillips
A new study has demonstrated a significant benefit of adding a magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) study to the standard diagnostic workup following a new
diagnosis of breast cancer in one breast.
By using MRI to examine the opposite breast in a population of 969 women with
newly diagnosed breast cancer, researchers from the NCI-funded American College
of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) discovered 3.1 percent of the patients had
cancers in the contralateral breast that were missed by standard practice
mammography and clinical breast exam. A negative result on the MRI exam of the
contralateral breast nearly eliminated the likelihood (0.3 percent) of cancer
being found in that breast over the next year, they reported in the March 29
New England Journal of Medicine.
MRI demonstrated a 91-percent sensitivity (percentage of true cancers
detected) and 88-percent specificity (percentage of true negatives), and MRI
efficacy was not affected by patients' cancer type, age, or breast density.
"We can now identify the vast majority of contralateral cancers at the time
of a woman's initial breast cancer diagnosis," said the study's principal
investigator, Dr. Constance Lehman, professor of radiology and director of
breast imaging at the University of Washington and Seattle Cancer Care Alliance.
Finding cancer in the opposite breast at this juncture will help avoid the
cost, morbidity, and stress of multiple or delayed treatments, Dr. Lehman said.
And a negative result on the opposite breast with mammography, clinical exam,
and MRI also may allow women to forego prophylactic bilateral mastectomies, "a
potential outcome that we would be delighted to see," she added.
The NCI-funded trial is the first of this size on the topic, with more than
1,000 patients enrolled, including those being treated at academic medical
centers, community hospitals, and private practices. Adding a contemporaneous
MRI to the diagnostic workup effectively doubled the number of contralateral
cancers typically found. In 121 cases, MRI findings led to biopsies, 30 of which
resulted in cancer diagnoses. Of these, 60 percent were invasive cancers, while
the remainder were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), abnormal cell
clusters in the lining of the breast duct that have not invaded other tissue but
that can progress to full-blown invasive tumors.
Three additional tumors - all DCIS less than 5 mm in size - were diagnosed
upon analyses of mastectomy tissue samples.
That one of every four cases referred for biopsy based on the MRI turned out
to be cancerous is an important finding, according to Dr. Carl Jaffe, chief of
the NCI Cancer Imaging Program's Diagnostic Imaging Branch. With conventional
mammography, that ratio is generally closer to one in six.
"So, relative to mammography, MRI was far more specific," Dr. Jaffe said.
"These contralateral breasts would have been considered negative based on
mammography and a clinical exam. This is important because treatment planning
for these women would have been based on incomplete information on the full
extent of the disease. That's why these results are so striking."
Dr. Christy A. Russell, co-director of the University of Southern California/Norris
Comprehensive Cancer Center's Lee Breast Center, suggested that
this study and others should be considered in the development of
consensus guidelines related to the diagnostic evaluation of a woman
with newly diagnosed breast cancer.
 |
 |
Guidelines
Recommend Annual MRI Breast Screening for High-Risk
Women |
 |
| New guidelines from
the American Cancer Society (ACS) released last week recommend
that some women at high risk of developing breast cancer
should undergo annual screenings with both mammography
and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In certain groups
of women, the recommendations explain, conducting both
tests annually increases the likelihood of early detection.
The guidelines were published in the March issue of CA:
A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. To
minimize the risk of avoidable biopsies, fear, anxiety,
and adverse health effects, explained Dr. Christy Russell,
who chaired the ACS expert advisory group that developed
the recommendations, it is "imperative to carefully
select those women who should be screened using this
technology."
The guidelines advise that women should
receive an annual MRI screening and mammogram if they
have or have had: a BRCA1 or BRCA2
mutation or a first-degree relative with a BRCA1
or BRCA2 mutation; a lifetime breast cancer
risk of 20 to 25 percent or greater based on one of
several accepted risk assessment tools; radiation to
the chest between the ages of 10 and 30; or Li-Fraumeni
syndrome, Cowden syndrome, Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba
syndrome, or a history of these syndromes in a first-degree
relative.
The recommendations state that MRI breast
screenings should be conducted on machines equipped
with a breast coil and that meet certain performance
parameters. They also state that "the ability to
perform MRI-guided biopsy is absolutely essential to
offering screening MRI." |
 |
|
"What we're seeing in this study and our new ACS guidelines
is that the use of MRI is evolving to better meet the needs of subgroups
of women, either women at very high risk and for whom mammography
may be less effective, or in women with a newly diagnosed breast
cancer, where MRI can identify cancers in the same breast or contralateral
breast that were missed by mammography," continued Dr. Russell,
who chaired the American Cancer Society panel that released new
recommendations last week on breast screening in high risk individuals
using MRI (see sidebar).
Because the use and practice of breast MRI is still evolving in the United
States and is not available in all clinical settings, Drs. Jaffe and Russell
indicated that some obstacles still remain to its wider adoption.
Although its use for breast screening has increased - e.g., as a follow-up to
an abnormal mammogram - insurers generally do not cover MRI for screening the
opposite breast. That could change, however, based on these study results.
And, as Dr. Jaffe pointed out, MRI machines specifically set up to do breast
screenings - those that have a breast "coil" and in settings with the ability to
perform biopsy - need to become more widely available.
To ensure the highest quality scan, Dr. Russell advised that women undergoing
a diagnostic MRI go to a center that has an MRI machine appropriately equipped
for breast imaging. She also advised having the screening procedure done at a
facility with biopsy capability and experience.
If a suspicious lesion is found on the MRI, but the center is not equipped
to do a biopsy, she explained, then the woman will have to be referred
to another center and repeat the entire imaging procedure to guide
the biopsy.
|