| July 19,
2007
Sun-Times News Group
Second Opinions... They Can Ease Your
Mind, Maybe Even Save Your Life
BY STEPHANIE FOSNIGHT
Getting a second opinion about a drastic and troubling
medical procedure is not a modern idea.
"In ancient Greece, it was common to travel to
a temple of Asclepius for a procedure known as incubation, where
the god would come in a dream and indicate a cure or a prognosis,"
said Daniel Garrison, a classics professor at Northwestern University.
Today's patients may not pilgrimage to a temple and
wait for a dream, but an uncomfortable diagnosis may send them to
a practitioner outside conventional medicine, such as an acupuncturist
or chiropractor. Or a concerned patient may well ask his or her
doctor for a second opinion from another physician within the medical
community. Patients may also find themselves in another waiting
room when their family doctors deem a second opinion is necessary,
often if the treatment includes a drastic option like surgery.
Whatever path you take to get one, the goal of seeking
second opinions is to help both patient and doctor know the selected
treatment plan is the best available option, and reasonable physicians
should encourage the proper use of second opinions, said family
doctor Russell Robertson.
"You don't want to feel you're rushed into making
a decision, unless there is very little time, and you want to have
confidence in your doctor, especially if it's a life-threatening
illness," said Dr. Robertson, head of family medicine at Evanston
Northwestern Healthcare.
Garrison said the practice of several doctors conferring
about one patient's case is built into the western medical system.
"In the Early Modern period, when the patient
was a VIP of some kind, doctors would have consultations with each
other and even issue written consilia, or opinions like legal opinions,
that became part of the medical literature," said Garrison,
an expert in early medical history.
These consilia, however, were deliberately written
in Latin so laymen couldn't read them.
"This kind of second opinion was definitely not
for the patient to know," Garrison.
Doctor's orders
Bob Georges recently found himself the object of medical interest
among several doctors, although this being 2007, he was privy to
all of the opinions himself.
The story started when Georges began to experience
rectal discomfort and bleeding. He tried treating himself with an
over-the-counter hemorrhoid cream, but when the problem persisted
he went to his trusted family doctor, who then prescribed a hemorrhoid
cream.
"He told me to try the cream and, if that didn't
work, to get an opinion from a gastroenterologist," recalled
Georges, 62.
That gastroenterologist diagnosed a fistula but sent
Georges for another opinion from a surgeon before embarking on a
treatment. The surgeon, Jose Velasco, chair of surgery at Rush North
Shore Medical Center in Skokie, examined Georges, concluded he didn't
have a fistula or hemorrhoids after all, and immediately ordered
a biopsy.
"It came back cancerous," said Georges,
who then underwent a year of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation
for anal-rectal cancer. He is now cancer-free and is looking forward
to resuming his normal activities, especially baby-sitting his 2-year-old
granddaughter.
"If it wasn't for the complete confidence and
faith I have in my family doctor, who really encouraged me to seek
another opinion, I might have just waited it out and seen if it
got better," he said.
A successful patient-physician relationship is built
on trust, said Robertson. That means not only taking suggestions,
but also being comfortable enough to question your doctor when you
have doubts.
"People are often afraid to ask for a second
opinion because they don't want to make the doctor angry by inferring
that his or her judgment isn't trusted," Robertson said. "A
physician who is truly confident in his or her treatment plan will
not feel the least bit threatened if a second opinion is requested.
If you get a defensive or hostile response, to me that underscores
the validity of the request."
Robertson experienced this himself when his own father
requested a second opinion from his ophthalmologist about his macular
degeneration. The doctor became very angry at Robertson's father,
and it forever damaged their relationship.
"He didn't follow through with subsequent care
as a result of that," Robertson said.
Getting educated
Margaret Moore, a 56-year-old Deerfield woman, went to her gynecologist
last fall because of pain and heavy menstrual periods. After a short
examination, her doctor told her that her uterus had "flipped
over onto itself," that it was unlike anything he'd ever seen,
and that she needed a hysterectomy.
When Moore, a social worker who's been in the medical
field, told the gynecologist that she'd like to learn more before
going straight to a hysterectomy, he brushed her concerns aside
and told her to get in for surgery. So Moore started talking to
her friends, all of whom advised her to go for a second opinion.
She ended up at Rush North Shore's Centre for Women's
Health, where her new gynecologist did a more thorough exam, explained
his findings, ordered more specific tests and then began to present
her with options. When he began to explain that she had a diseased
ovary as well as fibroids and began discussing the pros and cons
of hysterectomy, Moore told him she'd made up her mind and wanted
the drastic surgery.
"I didn't mind getting a hysterectomy if that's
what it needs to be," she said. "I just didn't want someone
to tell me that's the only option and not tell me why."
A month after her surgery, Moore is feeling great,
especially since she's now minus the 16 pounds she'd gained from
cysts and fibroids. She's also composing a letter she hopes will
gently criticize the first practice so as to help other women.
Patients more involved
Surgical oncologist Tina J. Hieken is accustomed to having her patients
ask for second opinions, especially breast cancer patients who must
choose between mastectomies and breast-conserving surgeries.
"One of the biggest shifts in medicine over the
last couple of decades is we put more onus on patients to make decisions
about things," said Dr. Hieken, of Rush North Shore. "We
don't hear 'Doctor, what should I do?' quite as much as we used
to."
So when Hieken's patients come into her office with
paperwork they've printed off the Internet or with a request to
see another doctor, she tries to accommodate them and help them
make the best choice possible.
"Mastectomy versus breast-conserving surgery
is the patient's personal decision, and if I think one would be
better than the other from a medial or recuperative standpoint,
I tell her what I think and why," Hieken said. "Sometimes
patients just need to be told, 'Yes, I agree with what your doctor
recommended."
Second opinions, then, can increase a patient's confidence
in a treatment plan, can bring about a correct or more complete
diagnosis, and can provide more options when it comes to selecting
a treatment.
However, they can also increase the patient's confusion
if everyone, including friends and families, are advocating another
course of action.
"I think it's important that, if we give multiple
opinions, we have to think about what's in the patient's best interest,"
Hieken said.
Robertson is happy to go over Internet research with
his patients or suggest other doctors they can see, but he said
that in the end, he won't always say what they want to hear. Yet
it's important to have the chance to ask questions and gather as
many opinions as possible.
"I want you to believe you did everything you
could under the circumstances with the information you had, so if
the outcome turns out to be not what you hoped for, at least you're
not wishing you'd done it differently," he said. "That
kind of second guessing weighs very heavily on people."
|